next up previous contents index
Next: The different nature of Up: Eight main differences between Previous: Size differences between NL

The different legal status of written texts and spoken words

With few exceptions, the texts in NL corpora have previously been published. From a legal point of view, this implies that any use of electronic copies should adhere to copyright   rules and regulations. In most countries copyright laws were passed long before the era of electronic publishing. However, laws designed to protect printed materials may not be optimal for the protection of machine readable text. Neither is it obvious how abuse of electronic texts can be detected and prevented. These problems have impeded the distribution of NL corpora quite considerably and it would be optimistic to suggest that all problems are close to a solution.
For SL corpora the legal issues are even less well understood. Has a speaker who is recorded while reading sentences presented by an experimenter any legal rights with respect to the sounds produced? Recordings of spontaneous speech  are even more complex in this respect, since a speaker might claim rights as to the contexts and details of the formulations used. If speakers are recruited to contribute to a SL corpus, legal problems can be avoided by requesting them to sign a consent form. Building corpora from existing recordings (e.g. from radio and television broadcasts) is more difficult in this respect, because it may not always be feasible to contact all relevant speakers. Under the law of EU countries unauthorised re-broadcast of recordings made from radio or television is illegal. It is less clear what the legal status is of limited redistribution of recordings for research and development in speech science and technology. For more information on this topic, we refer to Section 4.3.4.

EAGLES SWLG SoftEdition, May 1997. Get the book...