Year | exponent | discoverer (credited persons) | statement | method | comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antique | p | - | conjecture | guess | all mersenne numbers with prime exponent are primes |
Antique | 2 | - | proved prime | TD | confirm conjecture |
Antique | 3 | - | proved prime | TD | confirm conjecture |
Antique | 5 | - | proved prime | TD | confirm conjecture |
Antique | 7 | - | proved prime | TD | confirm conjecture |
1456 | 13 | Codex Lat. Monac 14908 | proved prime | TD | 23 trial divisions |
1536 | 11 | Hudalricus Regius | factor 23 published | TD | disproof that all mersenne numbers are prime |
1588 | 17 | Pietro Cataldi | proved prime | TD | 71 trial divisions |
1588 | 19 | Pietro Cataldi | proved prime | TD | 127 trial divisions |
1640 | 23 | Pierre de Fermat | smallest factor 47 found | FD | conjectured factor form: d = 2pk+1 |
1640 | 37 | Pierre de Fermat | smallest factor 223 found | FD | conjectured factor form: d = 2pk+1 |
1644 | p | Marin Mersenne | conjecture | guess | conjectured all Mersenne primes <= 257 have one of these exponents: 2,3,5,7,13,17,19,31,67,127,257 |
1732 | 29 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 233 found | FD | proved factor form; 2 trial divisions |
1732 | 43 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 431 found | FD | proved factor form; 2 trial divisions |
1732 | 73 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 439 found | FD | proved factor form; 2 trial divisions |
1732 | 83 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 167 found | ES | proved special factor theorem |
1732 | 131 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 263 found | ES | proved special factor theorem |
1732 | 179 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 359 found | ES | proved special factor theorem |
1732 | 191 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 383 found | ES | proved special factor theorem |
1732 | 239 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 479 found | ES | proved special factor theorem |
1732 | 251 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 503 found | ES | proved special factor theorem |
1741 | 47 | Leonhard Euler | smallest factor 2351 found | FE | proved preciser factor form: 7 trial divisions |
1750 | 31 | Leonhard Euler | proved prime | FE | proved preciser factor form: 84 trial divisions |
1856 | 79 | Carl Gustav Reuschle | smallest factor published | FE | 2 trial divisions |
1856 | 113 | Carl Gustav Reuschle | smallest factor published | FE | 3 trial divisions |
1856 | 233 | Carl Gustav Reuschle | smallest factor published | FE | 2 trial divisions |
1859 | 41 | Giovanni Antonio Amedeo Plana | smallest factor found | FE | 17 trial divisions |
1867 | 53 | Fortune Landry | smallest factor found | FE | 6 trial divisions |
1876 | p | Francois Edouard A. Lucas | Lucas Test formulated | LT | efficient iterative test |
1876 | 67 | Francois Edouard A. Lucas | disproved(?) prime | LT | 65 iterations -- calculation was never checked |
1876 | 127 | Francois Edouard A. Lucas | proved prime | LT | 125 iterations |
1878 | 59 | Fortune Landry | smallest factor found | FE | 143 trial divisions |
1883 | 61 | Ivane M. Pervouchine | proved prime | LT | 59 iterations |
1883 | 97 | H. Le Lasseur | smallest factor found | FE | 7 trial divisions |
1883 | 151 | H. Le Lasseur | smallest factor found | FE | 8 trial divisions |
1883 | 211 | H. Le Lasseur | smallest factor found | FE | 4 trial divisions |
1883 | 223 | H. Le Lasseur | smallest factor found | FE | 3 trial divisions |
1895 | 197 | Allan J. C. Cunningham | smallest factor found | FE | 2 trial divisions |
1908 | 163 | Allan J. C. Cunningham | smallest factor found | FE | 42 trial divisions |
1909 | 71 | Allan J. C. Cunningham | smallest factor found | FE | 150 trial divisions |
1911 | 89 | R. E. Powers | proved prime | LT | 87 iterations |
1911 | 181 | Herbert J. Woodall | smallest factor found | FE | 15 trial divisions |
1912 | 173 | Allan J. C. Cunningham | smallest factor found | FE | ? trial divisions |
1914 | 103 | R. E. Powers | disproved(?) prime | LT | 101 iterations -- calculation was never checked |
1914 | 107 | R. E. Powers | proved prime | LT | 105 iterations |
1914 | 109 | R. E. Powers | disproved(?) prime | LT | 107 iterations -- calculation was never checked |
1926 | 139 | Derrick H. Lehmer | disproved prime | LL | 137 iterations |
1932 | 149 | Derrick H. Lehmer | disproved prime | LL | 147 iterations |
1932 | 257 | Derrick H. Lehmer | disproved prime | LL | 255 iterations |
1934 | 241 | R. E. Powers | disproved prime | LL | 239 iterations |
1944 | 157 | Horace. S. Uhler | disproved prime | LL | 155 iterations |
1944 | 167 | Horace S. Uhler | disproved prime | LL | 165 iterations |
1944 | 193 | Horace S. Uhler | disproved prime | LL | 191 iterations |
1945 | 229 | Horace S. Uhler | disproved prime | LL | 227 iterations |
1946-07-27 | 199 | Horace S. Uhler | disproved prime | LL | 197 iterations |
1947-06-04 | 227 | Horace S. Uhler | disproved prime | LL | 225 iterations |
1947 | p <= 257 | - | Mersenne's conjecture believed to be checked | FE/LL | 101 & 137 were wronlgy checked or claimed by E. Fauquembergue in 1914 and 1920 to be prime |
1952 | p <= 257 | Raphael M. Robinson | checked Mersenne numbers | LL | successfully used first computer for Mersenne search |
1952 | 101 | Raphael M. Robinson | disproved prime | LL | showed E. Fauquembergue miscalculated |
1952 | 137 | Raphael M. Robinson | disproved prime | LL | showed E. Fauquembergue miscalculated |
1952-01-30 | 521 | Raphael M. Robinson | proved prime | LL | SWAC used |
1952-01-30 | 607 | Raphael M. Robinson | proved prime | LL | SWAC used |
1952-06-25 | 1279 | Raphael M. Robinson | proved prime | LL | SWAC used |
1953 | p < 2304 | Raphael M. Robinson | checked Meresenne numbers | LL | SWAC used |
1957 | 8191 | David J. Wheeler | disproved prime | LL | Illiac I used |
1957 | 2300 < p < 3300 | Hans Riesel | checked Meresenne numbers | LL | BESK used |
1957-09-08 | 3217 | Hans Riesel | proved prime | LL | BESK used |
1961 | 3300 < p < 5000 | Alexander Hurwitz | checked Meresenne numbers | LL | IBM 7090 used |
1961-11-03 | 4253 | Alexander Hurwitz | proved prime | LL | IBM 7090 used |
1961-11-03 | 4423 | Alexander Hurwitz | proved prime | LL | IBM 7090 used |
1962 | 5000 < p < 6000 | Alexander Hurwitz | checked Meresenne numbers | LL | IBM 7090 used |
1963 | 6000 < p < 7000 | Sidney Kravitz and Murray Berg | checked Meresenne numbers | LL | IBM 7090 used |
1983 | p | Samuel S. Wagstaff, H. W. Lenstra, Carl B. Pomerance | conjecture | guess | the number of Mersenne primes up to the limit N is about C ln ln N, with C= eg/ ln 2 |